For the publisher:
The point made by some people in your March 2 article (“Tighten the 90/10 rule”) that closing the 90/10 rule is unfair because it is not a direct measure of quality and penalizes schools that enroll low-income students is spurious. The 90/10 rule, like many other outcome-based measures, is not intended to be a direct measure of quality, but serves as a necessary proxy for the systemic risk of taxpayers in the absence of a universally accepted measure. Whether you’re talking about loan repayment rates, graduation rates, placement rates, or even pass rates on licensure tests, these are all quality metrics, and they are valid in and of themselves. ‘they are used correctly and in tandem.
Those who say it is unfair to close the loophole in the 90/10 rule would also argue that it is unfair to hold a school accountable when less than a third of its students are making progress by paying back their principal. ready ? It’s a bit like saying we shouldn’t have a speed limit on the freeway because speed is not a direct measure of personal car safety.
The question is not how many private schools would close by closing this loophole, but how many with good results would close. I suspect we could probably count on one hand the number of private colleges over 90% dependent on federal dollars, which teach more than one subject and are not located directly on a military base which in fact perform well in several areas.
Assistant Director of Financial Aid
Kennesaw State University